1992-1995 (Hypertext novel: Title page 2Kb)
This is an anotated top level index of some hyperfiction resources. I shall only include direct pointers to works of fiction here if I'm prepared to review them; otherwise, I shall hold pointers to other people's lists.
Logo © David Benson 1995; reproduced with permission
A collaborative hypertext fiction initiated by David Benson, No Dead Trees is an extremely ambitious hypermedia experiment, with multiple authors handling multiple characters with multiple lives in multiple universes.
The story is presented in short, third person fragments of about one to eight hundred words. The short fragments and -- to me -- unclear navigation tools contribute to a feeling of disorientation which, while disturbing, melds well with the ambience of the plot.
Striking visuals, and, on the introduction pages, bold colours and striking web design, contribute to the feel of the piece.
The genre is broadly horror, with links to science fiction.
The No Dead Trees logo is, in my opinion, a thing of beauty in itself, and a fitting icon for the whole hypertext fiction project.
A collaborative fiction in tiny -- fifty to five hundred word -- fragments, initiated by Judy Carson. The linking scheme is highly formal, with no embedded links and an apparent canonical ordering; each tiny fragment is terminated with links 'forwards - backwards - link - or rewind'. These give the reader a sense of control and orientation.
The short, rather disjointed fragments are written in first person from a number of actors, rather in 'stream of consciousness' style. The authors manage to achieve a very fair degree of commonality of voice. Over all, I found this fiction easy to approach, easy to get into and easy to read, although I've by no means completed my exploration of it.
I think it would be unkind to claim this work belonged to a conventional genre. It is a fictionalised account of an incident from the principal authors life; a road traffic accident and it's aftermath.
give me feedback on this page // show previous feedback on this page